Henderson v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, J.
The petitioner, Daniel Henderson, appeals from the dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the habeas court improperly concluded that (1) he was not entitled to a review of the constitutionality of General Statutes § BS&AOb,1 the sentencing statute under which his sentence had been enhanced, and (2) the sentencing court had not sentenced him in an illegal manner. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the habeas court.
*501The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our disposition of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Johnson v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Cobham v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Jeffrey v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jackson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- LAPOINTE v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Andrades v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Woods v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Johnson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.