Legal Opinion

DOCKERY v. HERETICK

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 27, 2021No. 2:17-cv-04114Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LARRY G. DOCKERY : CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff : : v. : NO. 17-4114 : STEPHEN E. HERETICK, et al. : Defendants : MEMORANDUM OPINION DAVID R. STRAWBRIDGE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE January 27, 2021 I. INTRODUCTION Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Larry Dockery (“Plaintiff” or “Dockery”) motion to compel responses from Defendant Stephen Heretick (“Defendant” or “Heretick”) to interrogatories and document requests. As the facts of this case are well known to the parties, we present here only those facts relevant…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Howard Jay Josephs v. Harris Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  3. Bayer AG v. Betachem, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  4. Montgomery County v. Microvote Corporation Carson Manufacturing Company, Inc. Westchester Fire Insurance Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  5. Hansel v. Shell Oil Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API