Legal Opinion
Dingler v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided July 24, 2008No. A08A1572PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKBURN, Presiding Judge.
Following a jury trial, Larry Dingier appeals his conviction for violating the Georgia Controlled Substances Act (GCSA), 1 contending that (1) the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict, (2) the trial court erred by admitting certain evidence seized from a co-defendant, (3) the State improperly commented on his failure to present evidence, (4) the State improperly referred to a co-defendant’s guilty plea not in evidence, and (5) the trial court erroneously prohibited him from explaining the terms of a co-defendant’s guilty plea. For the reasons that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
- Hewitt v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
- Jennings v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Issa v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- STALLINGS v. the STATE.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
- O'NEAL v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
- O'NEAL v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.