Legal Opinion · Dissent

O'NEAL v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 8, 2010No. S10G0060Published

1DissentThompson, Justice

The intent of OCGA § 17-8-75 is to prohibit argument which introduces facts that are not put on the record and are calculated to prejudice the accused. Adams v. State, 260 Ga. 298, 299 (392 SE2d 866) (1990). See also Dingler v. State, 293 Ga. App. 27, 31, 32 (666 SE2d 441) (2008). The statute consists of two sentences. The first sentence authorizes the trial court to intervene on its own motion to prevent counsel from injecting prejudicial facts which are not in evidence by way of argument. See Brooks v. State, 183 Ga. 466, 468 (188 SE 711) (1936). The second sentence provides additional…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Street Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  2. Arrington v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  3. Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  4. Augusta & Summerville Railroad v. Randall & WifeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  5. Bolden v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API