Legal Opinion

Holt v. Ring

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 25, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMehafry, J.

Suit was brought in the Pulaski Chancery Court by appellants, owners of real estate within the boundaries of Street Improvement District No. 465 of Little Rock. The suit is an attack on the proceedings in the city council and also an attack on the validity of the district.

The complaint, as abstracted, shows that appellants contend that there was no proper and legal certification, as provided by law, covering the value of real estate within the district. (2) That there is no legal certification from the county clerk’s office that a majority in value signed said petition. (3) That the city…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crane v. Siloam SpringsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
  2. Ahern v. Board of Improvement District No. 3Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1901
  3. Smith v. Improvement District No. 14Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  4. Lipscomb v. LenonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davidson v. Sewer Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  2. American State Bank, Charleston v. Street Imp. Dist. No. 3Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API