Legal Opinion

American State Bank, Charleston v. Street Imp. Dist. No. 3

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 6, 1939No. 4-5473PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Grieein Smith, C. j.

Invalidation of Street Improvement District No. 3 of the town of Charleston, Arkansas, was sought in a proceeding instituted by appellant, the allegation being that there was material variation in boundaries declared in the petition and those shown in the statutory notice 1 as published.

In substance the agreed statement is: Second street, under the description proposed in the petition, would he paved from Greenwood street to Prairie street'. Second street runs east and west. Vine street is one block east of Prairie. In the newspaper publication there are two descriptions:…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cox v. Road Improvement District No. 8Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  2. Paschal v. SwepstonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  3. Bell v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  4. McRaven v. ClancySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  5. Smith v. Improvement District No. 14Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1913

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Linder v. Street Improvement District No. 9Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  2. Loetscher v. Baseline Sewer Imp. Dist. No. 201Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API