Legal Opinion
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Gregory
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided February 8, 1988No. Misc. (Subtitle BV) No. 14, September Term, 1986PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McAULIFFE, Judge.
The Attorney Grievance Commission alleges that Roger Milton Gregory, Jr., during 1984 and 1985, engaged in improper solicitation of defendants in criminal cases by in-person solicitation and by targeted mailings. 1 Respondent admits that he made a practice of initiating personal contacts with criminal defendants outside courtrooms where those defendants had just been advised of their right to counsel, and of then introducing himself as an attorney, handing the defendants a letter soliciting their business, and suggesting that they call him. He further admits to sending…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Zachair, Ltd. v. DriggsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1997
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. PenningtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Attorney Griev. Comm'n of Maryland v. Franz & LipowitzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. CarithersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Brown & Sturm v. Frederick Road Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.