Lloyds of London v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge:
At issue in this case is the applicability of the Louisiana Oilfield Anti-Indemnity Act (the “LOALA”) to a contract involving sandblasting and painting work on an interstate gas transmission pipeline company’s pipelines and platforms in the Gulf of Mexico. Transcontinental Pipe Line Corporation (“Transco”) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Lloyds of London. Because we conclude that the summary judgment evidence in the record is insufficient to support the summary judgment, we vacate the judgment and remand.
I
Harrington…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kenneth Walker v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation v. Transportation Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Jimmie Joseph Johnson v. Amoco Production Co., Amoco Production Co., Third-Party v. Technical Compression Services, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Nerco Oil & Gas, Inc. v. M.R. Friday, Inc.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1993
- Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. Transcontinental Gas Pipeline Corp.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1994
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lloyds of London, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Roberts v. Energy Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Tetra Technologies, Inc. v. Continental InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- John E. Graham & Sons v. BrewerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- In re Complaint of John E. Graham & SonsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.