Legal Opinion
Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. Transcontinental Gas Pipeline Corp.
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Decided January 11, 1994No. CV 90-2368PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM RULING
TRIMBLE, District Judge.
Presently before the court are cross motions for summary judgment. Both parties seek a declaratory judgment to determine whether or not the Louisiana Oilfield Anti-Indemnity Act (LOAIA) applies to the contract of indemnity between Harrington Enterprises, Inc. (Harrington) and Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation (Transco). Harrington was insured by Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London and Certain Insurance Companies. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) a report and recommendation was prepared and filed by Magistrate Judge Wilson.
For the reasons…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation v. Transportation Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lloyds of London, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Lloyds of London v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994