Legal Opinion

Hyperion, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 17, 2014No. 1:13-cv-01012PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER 1

LETTOW, Judge.

This post-award bid protest concerns a contract awarded by the United States Army (“the Army” or “the government”) to benefit the Jordanian Armed Forces by providing installation and infrastructure upgrades to fiber optic cable networks in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan (“Jordan”). The acquisition satisfies a Foreign Military Sales requirement. The procurement was a small business set-aside acquisition intended to result in the award of a single firm, fixed-price contractual award to the lowest priced technically acceptable (“LPTA”) proposal. Four entities…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  4. Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  5. Information Technology & Applications Corporation v. United States, and Rs Information Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. American Auto Logistics, Lp v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  2. Springfield Parcel C, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  3. Greenland Contractors I/S v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  4. Universal Marine Company, K.S.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  5. Hyperion, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API