Birch v. Fire Insurance Exchange
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McHUGH, Judge:
¶ 1 Randy Birch appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Fire Insurance Exchange (Fire), Birch’s provider of homeowner’s insurance. The trial court held that Birch was only entitled to recover his deductible from Fire in proportion to Fire’s subrogation recovery from third-party insurers. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 Neighborhood children were playing with matches and started a fire southwest of Birch’s property. The fire spread and damaged Birch’s fence and landscaping. A plane dropped fire retardant to stop the blaze, but the fire retardant contained a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lyon v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1971
- Hill v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
- Gibbs M. Smith, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1997
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 2003
- Transamerica Insurance Company v. BarnesUtah Supreme Court · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kramer v. State Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008
- Farm Bureau v. WestonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023
- Gunn v. Utah State Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
- Lauri Daniels v. State Farm Mutual Auto InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- Wilson v. Educators Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.