Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Reynolds v. Howell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1912No. 10755PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Application for a writ of prohibition, filed in the supreme court September SO, 1912, to prohibit the state canvassing board from certifying defendant’s nomination as governor.

1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.

This is an application for a permanent writ of prohibition prohibiting the state canvassing board from *468certifying to the secretary of state the nominatiorL of the defendant Black as governor of the state, and prohibiting the latter from certifying his nomination.

The relator alleges in his affidavit that he is an adherent of the democratic party, a citizen of the United States, a citizen, resident, taxpayer and elector of the state; that the defendants Howell, Clausen and Lewis constitute the state canvassing board; that the defendant Howell is the secretary of state; that at the primary…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Nourse v. ClarkeNevada Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Taylor v. SullivanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  3. Hoy v. State, ex rel. BuchananIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Smith v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. State ex rel. Perine v. Van BeekSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Redmond v. CarterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  2. Slater v. VarneyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. State Ex Rel. Todd v. ReevesWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  4. State ex rel. Chandler v. HowellWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. State Ex Rel. Pennick v. HallWashington Supreme Court · 1946

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API