Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Sullivan

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 30, 1891PublishedCited by 42 opinions

Application for a writ of quo warranto. Motion by respondent to dismiss.

1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.

By this proceeding, the relator seeks an adjudication as to the right of the respondent to hold the office of county attorney of Stearns county, for which office he received a majority of the votes cast at the general election in 1890. The point of contention is whether the respondent was legally elected, and can hold the *310office under such election, he being of foreign birth, and having never declared his intention to become a citizen of the United States until after such election. The contention that the relator has no such private interest in the matter as justifies him to invoke a decision…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. TiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. State ex rel. Schuet v. MurrayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  3. State ex rel. Nourse v. ClarkeNevada Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Smith v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Barnum v. GilmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. McKinney v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  2. Finklea v. FarishSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  3. State ex rel. Thayer v. BoydNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Slater v. VarneyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. State Ex Rel. West, Atty. Gen. v. BreckinridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API