Legal Opinion

Emery v. State

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 31, 1983No. 9072; CA A25025PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

This is a civil case in which plaintiffs seek compensation for damage to a motor vehicle that resulted when state police officers, during a lawful seizure and search, cut holes in the body of the vehicle in search of bullets and ballistics data to be used as evidence in a homicide prosecution. The specific issue presented is whether the state must pay for private property, not contraband or otherwise subject to forfeiture, which is lawfully seized for evidentiary use in a criminal investigation and which is necessarily damaged or destroyed by the state in the performance of necessary…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. North American Cold Storage Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. United States v. Caltex (Philippines), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Bowditch v. BostonSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Lionshead Lake, Inc. v. Township of WayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Juragua Iron Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. City of La GrandeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  2. Emery v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Emery v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API