Rasmussen v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
ANNUNZIATA, Judge.
David T. Rasmussen appeals his conviction for drank driving (third offense within ten years), contending that the result of a breathalyzer test administered to him following his arrest was improperly admitted at trial. We find no error and affirm.
FACTS
Upon review, we view the facts in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, the party prevailing below. See Clifton v. Commonwealth, 22 Va.App. 178, 180, 468 S.E.2d 155, 156 (1996) (citing Higginbotham v. Commonwealth, 216 Va. 349, 352, 218 S.E.2d 534, 537 (1975)). On August 3, 1997, Rasmussen was driving a motorcycle at 74…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Higginbotham v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
- Barr v. Town & Country Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1990
- Branch v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
- Gilliam v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1996
- City of Virginia Beach v. ESG Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Edwards v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2003
- Nelson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2003
- Dalo v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2001
- Saunders v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2006
- Johnson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2002
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.