Legal Opinion

Gilliam v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided January 11, 1996No. 2154941PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRAY, Judge.

Phillip Adrian Gilliam (defendant) was convicted by a jury in a bifurcated trial for aggravated sexual battery in violation of Code § 18.2-67.3(1) and was sentenced in accordance with the jury’s verdict to three years in the penitentiary. Defendant complains on appeal that the trial court erroneously permitted the jury to consider evidence, during the sentencing phase of the proceeding, of the punishments which attended his prior criminal convictions. We disagree and affirm the conviction.

The relevant procedural history is uncontroverted. Following conviction by the jury during…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Brown v. LukhardSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
  2. Gray v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  3. O'Dell v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  4. Branch v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
  5. Ansell v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1979

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Auer v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005
  2. Rasmussen v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1999
  3. Caudill v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
  4. Mosby v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
  5. Nelson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2003

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API