Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided March 19, 2002No. 0929011PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Judge.

Mark B. Johnson (appellant) was convicted in a bench trial of interfering with the operation of an aircraft, a misdemean- or, in violation of Code § 5.1-22. On appeal, he contends the trial court erred in: (1) finding Code § 5.1-22 does not require a specific intent to interfere; (2) finding the evidence was sufficient to convict; (3) not finding Code § 5.1-22 is unconstitutionally vague. For the reasons stated below, we affirm the conviction.

I. Background

On November 1, 2000, police pilot H.J. Alverez was operating a helicopter in the Magic Hollow area of the City of Virginia…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Higginbotham v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
  2. Jones v. ConwellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  3. Guill v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1998
  4. Commonwealth v. PresleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1998
  5. Campbell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Mouberry v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2003
  2. Arrington v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2009
  3. Alexy J. Abdo, a/k/a Alexi J. Abdo v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2015
  4. Brooks v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2006
  5. Tina Marie Bryant v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API