Johnson v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Judge.
Mark B. Johnson (appellant) was convicted in a bench trial of interfering with the operation of an aircraft, a misdemean- or, in violation of Code § 5.1-22. On appeal, he contends the trial court erred in: (1) finding Code § 5.1-22 does not require a specific intent to interfere; (2) finding the evidence was sufficient to convict; (3) not finding Code § 5.1-22 is unconstitutionally vague. For the reasons stated below, we affirm the conviction.
I. Background
On November 1, 2000, police pilot H.J. Alverez was operating a helicopter in the Magic Hollow area of the City of Virginia…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Higginbotham v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
- Jones v. ConwellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
- Guill v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1998
- Commonwealth v. PresleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1998
- Campbell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Mouberry v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2003
- Arrington v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2009
- Alexy J. Abdo, a/k/a Alexi J. Abdo v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2015
- Brooks v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2006
- Tina Marie Bryant v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2017
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.