Legal Opinion

Mohamed Mohamed v. Publix Super Markets

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided January 18, 2006No. 04-12834; D.C. Docket 02-61738-CV-CMAUnpublished

1Per curiam

Mohamed Mohamed appeals the lower court’s denial of his post-trial motions, and he contends that the District Court committed reversible error in fashioning the jury instructions. He also argues that the jury’s determination that he was entitled to no relief on his Fair Labor Standards Act claim was contrary to the clear weight of the evidence. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

BACKGROUND

Mohamed filed this action against his former employer, Publix Supermarkets, Inc., alleging racial and ethnic discrimination and retaliation. Additionally, he raised a claim under the Fair Labor Standards…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stone v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Paul H. Goffman v. Boniface Gross, Danny Jaimet, Lieutenant MaueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  3. Quebell P. Parker v. Scrap Metal ProcessorsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  4. Williams v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  5. McKenzie v. BentonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API