Legal Opinion

Quebell P. Parker v. Scrap Metal Processors

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 28, 2004No. 03-14516PublishedCited by 107 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1000KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge:

The plaintiffs, Quebell Parker (“Mrs. Parker”), Sandra Skypek, and Charles Parker, (collectively “the Parkers”), filed suit against the defendants, Scrap Metal Processors, Inc. (“SMP”) and its predecessors in interest, alleging negligence, negligence per se, nuisance, trespass, violations of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”) and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”), and violations of various state environmental statutes. A jury returned a verdict against the defendants on all counts. The defendants appeal only the jury’s determination that they are liable…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd. v. Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. United States v. JerniganCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by107 opinions

  1. Bruce Goldfarb v. Mayor and City Council of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
  2. Stalley Ex Rel. United States v. Orlando Regional Healthcare System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. Ronald Keith BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  4. Ecological Rights Foundation v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  5. Cordiano v. Metacon Gun Club, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API