Rockwell v. Queen City Bottling Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By HILDEBRANT, J.
Appeals on questions of law from the judgment of the trial court following an instructed verdict for the defendant at the conclusion of the opening statement of plaintiff’s counsel and the supplemental opening statement. The trial court gave plaintiff every opportunity to amend the petition, but plaintiff refused and elected' to stand thereon and requested opportunity to make a supplemental opening statement to the jury which request was refused after the-same was made to the court. The appeal here arises out of two-suits, one by a minor child, eight years of age, for…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Wargo v. BuckOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
- Cunningham v. Parkersburg Coca-Cola Bottling Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
- Clements v. Lima Mem. Hosp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Curry v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Fayette County Court of Common Pleas · 1954
- Kroger Company v. BowmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.