Legal Opinion

Hitchcock v. McElrath

California Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1886No. 9333PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco setting aside a default. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Searls, C.

This appeal is taken by the defendant from an order setting aside a default entered against plaintiff for want of an answer to an amended cross-complaint. Various reasons were set forth as grounds upon which the motion was made.

Two motions had been previously made with the same object in view, the first of which was denied without prejudice on account of the informality in the moving papers. The second was also denied, but for what reason does not clearly appear. Subsequently the order of denial was so modified as to permit plaintiff to renew his motion, which was accordingly done,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kenney v. KelleherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Bowers v. BobCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Masten v. Indiana Car & Foundry Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Pittock v. BuckIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  3. O'BRIEN v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Josephson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Fisk v. HicksSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API