Legal Opinion

Moede v. County of Stearns

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 19, 1890PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the district court for Stearns county, Searle, J., presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

Upon certiorari, the district court reviewed and quashed the proceedings of the board of county commissioners in forming a new school-district, and from this action of the court the board appeals. The respondent moves to dismiss the appeal on the grounds — -first, that in certiorari an appeal does not lie from the district to the supreme court; and, second, that, in any event, the board of commissioners have no such right. The first ground is not urged in the brief, and is clearly not well taken; for if certiorari be not a “civil action, ” within the meaning of the statute, it certainly is a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  2. Lemont v. County of DodgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  3. State ex rel. Mansfield v. Mayor of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  4. Christlieb v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Durner v. HueginWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Rommell v. WalshSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  3. B'd of Adj'm't of City of Ft. Worth v. StovallTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  4. State v. LOUISIANA RIVERBOAT GAMING COM'N & HORSESHOE ENTERT.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
  5. State ex rel. Johnson v. ClarkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API