Legal Opinion

Tanzer v. Haynie

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 7, 1976No. 74 Civ. 4857PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRANKEL, District Judge.

The recent penchant of large public corporations to thin the ranks of public stockholders by “freeze-out” mergers or by “going private” has produced a substantial volume of litigation. The four consolidated cases at bar are part of this development.>

Facts

The actions arose out of a merger in late 1974 by which the Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation (“J & L Steel”) was absorbed by a wholly-owned subsidiary of the LTV Corporation. Defendants having moved to dismiss under Fed.R. Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and (6), the allegations of the consolidated amended and supplemental…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,853 John Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  3. Southern Pacific Co. v. BogertSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Gustave Gerstle, (Cross-Appellants) v. Gamble-Skogmo, Inc., (Cross-Appellee)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,549 Irwin Popkin v. Warner B. BishopCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. In Re Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Herskowitz v. Nutri/System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  4. Merrit v. Libby, McNeill & LibbyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
  5. Mitchell Partners, L.P. v. Irex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API