Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Hamilton

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1912Published

Action by plaintiffs to compel the determination of a claim to real property under §§ 1638, 1639 of the Code of Oivil Procedure.

1Opinion of the CourtGavegan, J.

This action is brought by the plaintiffs as heirs and devisees of Robert Ray Hamilton against defendants as heirs, devisees and executors of the estate of Schuyler Hamilton to compel the determination of a claim to real property under sections 1638 and 1639 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and arose out of the following undisputed facts: Robert Ray Hamilton and Schuyler Hamilton, his brother, prior to 1881 were the owners of a large number of parcels of real property in the city of Hew York as tenants in common, including among other parcels certain vacant land on the northerly side of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brown v. . BowenNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  2. Baker v. . OakwoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Doscher v. WyckoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  4. Norris v. HoffmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  5. King v. TownshendNew York Supreme Court · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API