Norris v. Hoffman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, Charles F. Hoffman and another, from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiffs, entered" in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the 19th day.of February, 1909, upon the decision of the court-, rendered after a trial at the Hew York Special Term, overruling the defendants’ demurrer to the complaint.
1Opinion of the Court
McLaughlin, J.:
The defendants demurred to the'complaint upon the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The demurrer was overruled and they appeal.
The complaint alleges, in substance, that the plaintiffs are the owners in fee simple of certain premises in the city of New York, known as No. 110 West Forty-seventh street, and that the defendants are the owners of premises next adjoining on the easterly side, known as Nos. 106 and IOS West Forty-seventh street; that in the year 1858 one Day was the owner of all three lots and conveyed the one now belonging…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kitching v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Snell v. . LevittNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Griffen v. . KeeseNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Crain v. FoxNew York Supreme Court · 1853
- Deeves v. ConstableAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Wall v. RudolphCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Leasehold Estates, Inc. v. Fulbro Holding Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Wilson v. FordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
- Stone v. DonlonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Village of Larchmont v. City of New RochelleNew York Supreme Court · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.