Legal Opinion

King v. Townshend

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1894PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from special term, New York county. Action by Lewis C. King against John Townshend, impleaded with Mary H. Townshend. From an interlocutory judgment overruling a demurrer to the third defense in the answer of defendant John Townshend, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFollett, J.

The special proceedings for the determination of claims to real property authorized by title 2 of chapter 5 of the third part of volume 2 of the Revised Statutes were a substitute for the ancient mode of barring claims to real estate by fines and recoveries (1 Grab. Pr. 2d Ed. 71), authorized and regulated by chapter 58, Rev. Laws 1813, which act was repealed by section 93 of chapter 21, 2 Sess. Laws 1823, and by 2 Rev. St. 343, § 24 (McGregor v. Comstock, 17 N. Y. 162). In 1849, section 449 was added to the Code of Procedure, by which actions were authorized to compel the determination of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. . BoothNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  2. Fisher v. . HepburnNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Austin v. . GoodrichNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  4. Burnham v. . OnderdonkNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  5. Clark v. PoorNew York Supreme Court · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bradt v. GiovannoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  2. Dime Savings Bank v. ButlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  3. French v. City of New RochelleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  4. Midwood Park Co. v. BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  5. Loomis v. SemperNew York Supreme Court · 1902

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API