Legal Opinion

Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. Druz

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 4, 2003No. 01-3890PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

BECKER, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Dan Druz has appealed from the District Court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff Dean Witter in its action to enjoin Druz’s claim for arbitration before the National Association of Securities Dealers Regulation (“NASDR”). Druz raises a number of contentions on appeal, some of which are without merit. However, because we find that the District Court improperly ruled on the question whether Druz’s claims are time-barred by National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD”) Code of Arbitration Procedure § 10304 (1984), a matter…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Uchenna H. Okereke v. United States of America. United States of America v. Uchenna H. OkerekeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bellevue Drug Co. v. Advance PCSDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API