Legal Opinion

In re Krodel

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 15, 1955No. 6140PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the holding of the Primary-Examiner rejecting, as unpatentable over the prior art and as functional, claims 18 and 19, the only remaining claims in appellants’ application for a patent for a “Process for De-inlring Printed Waste Paper.”

The appealed claims read as follows:

18. The process of de-inking printed material which comprises forming an aqueous slurry of printed and shredded waste newsprint stock material, [then adding to the slurry a water soluble salt yielding an ion having a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Holland Furniture Co. v. Perkins Glue Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. In re DeLanceyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
  4. In Re LaurentCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  5. In re FullamCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. L-O-F Glass Fibers Company and Everett J. Cook v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
  2. Competitive Technologies v. Fujitsu Ltd.District Court, N.D. California · 2003
  3. Application of Benjamin Gruskin, Deceased, by Irma Kelly GruskinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  4. L-O-F Glass Fibers Company and Everett J. Cook v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API