In re Krodel
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, Judge
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the holding of the Primary-Examiner rejecting, as unpatentable over the prior art and as functional, claims 18 and 19, the only remaining claims in appellants’ application for a patent for a “Process for De-inlring Printed Waste Paper.”
The appealed claims read as follows:
18. The process of de-inking printed material which comprises forming an aqueous slurry of printed and shredded waste newsprint stock material, [then adding to the slurry a water soluble salt yielding an ion having a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Holland Furniture Co. v. Perkins Glue Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- In re DeLanceyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
- In Re LaurentCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
- In re FullamCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- L-O-F Glass Fibers Company and Everett J. Cook v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- Competitive Technologies v. Fujitsu Ltd.District Court, N.D. California · 2003
- Application of Benjamin Gruskin, Deceased, by Irma Kelly GruskinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
- L-O-F Glass Fibers Company and Everett J. Cook v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955