Choice v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
President Judge Bowman,
This case poses the question of whether the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (defendant) may lawfully and constitutionally extend the maximum sentence of a parolee who committed a crime while on parole, but was not convicted until after the expiration of the court-imposed maximum sentence. We hold that it can.
Robert Lee Choice (plaintiff) instituted his action by a complaint in mandamus filed with the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Defendant raised preliminary objections to the Supreme Court’s jurisdiction and a demurrer. The Supreme Court by Order…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Heacock v. MyersDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
- Commonwealth ex rel. Hall v. Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- United States ex rel. Heacock v. MyersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Williams v. Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Mitchell v. Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
3Cited by13 opinions
- Adams v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Mitchell v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Kuykendall v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Richmond v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Choice v. Pennsylvania Board of ParoleDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.