Legal Opinion

Williams v. Board of Probation & Parole

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 13, 1971No. 116 C.D. 1970PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

President Judge Bowman,

This mandamus action raises questions as to the statutory and constitutional authority of the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole to recommit plaintiff, Edward E. Williams, as a convicted parole violator to serve that portion of his original court imposed maximum sentence remaining when he was first paroled. His classification as a convicted parole violator was not effected until after the expiration of his original maximum sentence as imposed by the court or otherwise extended by the Board. Williams seeks to have this Court declare such recommitment…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Zerbst v. KidwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States Ex Rel. Heacock v. MyersDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Woods v. SteinerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1962
  4. Harley W. Miller v. C. T. Gladden, Warden of the Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  5. United States Ex Rel. Kloiber v. MyersDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kuykendall v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Knisley v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Choice v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Mitchell v. Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Commonwealth ex rel. Rambeau v. Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API