Legal Opinion

People v. Stephens

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1876PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Motion by defendants for a nonsuit.

1Opinion of the CourtWestbrook, J.

— This action was commenced in March, 1873, by Francis C. Barlow, then attorney-general of the state. Its object is to recover the damage which the plaintiffs have sustained by reason of a contract made between the state and the defendant Stephens, dated the 31st day of *237December, 1866, whereby the latter undertook to keep section number one of the Erie canal in repair, as in the contract is particularly defined, for the period of five years from the 1st day of January, 1867, for the price or sum of $70,000 per year, and also during the same period to dredge the Albany basin and remove and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Day v. . PoolNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Whitney v. AllaireNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  3. Lloyd v. BrewsterNew York Court of Chancery · 1834
  4. Bouchaud v. DiasNew York Supreme Court · 1846
  5. Sheldon v. . EdwardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1866

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. . StephensNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Kleinschmidt v. BinzelMontana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Hoffman v. SilverthornMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Burke v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1909
  5. Dickson v. MacKeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API