Legal Opinion
Dickson v. MacKey
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 27, 1923No. 11137PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBranson, J.
This action is for specific performance of an alleged contract to con- ■ rey 960 acres of land located in Harper county, Okla. The plaintiff, who is the plaintiff in error, brought this action in 1908 against the executor of the will and the hcjirs of Avis W. Mackey, deceased. The alleged contract plaintiff pleaded was letters and telegrams between himself and Avis W. Mackey, the last of which bore date of June) 28, 1906.
Venue, of the action was changed by agreement of the parties from Harper to Woodward county, and no point is made by either side as to this.
Plaintiff does not contend for the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Goldsborough v. HewittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Corrugated Culvert Co. v. Simpson Tp., McIntosh Cty.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Schuber v. McDuffeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Griffin v. SeymourSupreme Court of Iowa · 1863
- Peck v. First Nat. Bank of ClaremoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Powell v. ChastainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Factor Oil Co. v. BrydiaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- American Bank & Trust Co. v. FrensleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Hare Mining & Milling Co. v. KeysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.