Legal Opinion

Bloomingdale v. Chittenden

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1889PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Case made from Ionia. (Smith, J.) Replevin. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

The plaintiff commenced an action of replevin before a justice of the peace.

The parties appeared before the justice, when the plaintiff declared orally in replevin for the goods and chattels mentioned in the affidavit and writ.

The defendant pleaded the general issue, and then objected to the jurisdiction of the justice upon two grounds:

1. Because the bond was not in a penalty of double the *306amount or value of the property sworn to, and the sureties had not justified their pecuniary responsibility as such to a bond such as the statute requires.

2. Because the affidavit was not subscribed by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Dickinson v. SimondsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Elliott v. WhitmoreMichigan Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Wantulok v. WantulokWyoming Supreme Court · 1950
  2. First National Bank v. Clifton Armory Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Turner v. St. JohnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Norton v. HaugeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  5. Collins v. SchumpNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1911

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API