Legal Opinion
Price v. Price
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 28, 1948No. Civ. 13465PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINLEY, J. pro tem.
This is an appeal from a judgment for defendant on the pleadings.
The complaint is titled: “Complaint for Damages for breach of contract.” The first two paragraphs read as follows :
“I.
“That on the 24th day of January, 1935, plaintiff and defendant being then married to each other, entered into a property settlement agreement, a copy of which is hereto attached, made part of this complaint and marked Exhibit ‘A’ for identification.
“II.
“That thereafter in the proceedings Numbered 254543 in the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the City and County of San…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hough v. HoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Locke Paddon v. Locke PaddonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Lazar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Holloway v. HollowayOhio Supreme Court · 1935
- Baxter v. BaxterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. MansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Flynn v. FlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Herbert v. RiddellDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1952
- Lubin v. LubinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Shogren v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.