Legal Opinion

Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co. v. South Carolina

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 19, 1934No. 840PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the reason that the judgment of the Supreme Court of the State of South Carolina, insofar as the appellant seeks here to review it, was based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. Quong Ham Wah Co. v. Industrial Comm’n, 255 U.S. 445, 448, 449; Knights of Pythias v. Meyer, 265 U.S. 30, 32, 33; Swiss Oil Corp. v. Shanks, 273 U.S. 392, 411, 412; Hicklin v. Coney, 290 U.S. 169, 171; Live Oak Water Users Assn. v. Railroad Comm’n, 269 U.S. 354, 359; Girard Trust Co. v. Ocean & Lake Realty…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Trenton Potteries Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Hicklin v. ConeySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Supreme Lodge, Knights of Pythias v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Quong Ham Wah Co. v. Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Live Oak Water Users' Ass'n v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Poole v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API