Legal Opinion
Poole v. Florida
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 14, 1938No. 748Published
1Per curiam
The appeal herein is dismissed for the reason that the judgment sought to be reviewed is based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. Quong Ham Wah Co. v. Industrial Commission, 255 U. S. 445, 448, 449; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U. S. 312, 316, 317; Susquehanna Co. v. Tax Commission (No. 2) 283 U. S. 297, 299, 300; Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co. v. South Carolina, 291 U. S. 652. The motion for leave to proceed further in forma pauperis is denied.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hebert v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Quong Ham Wah Co. v. Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Susquehanna Power Co. v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co. v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934