Legal Opinion

Pitt River Power Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 7, 1942No. 45588PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoNes, Judge

This case is presented on demurrer. The question is whether the construction plans and activities of the defendant, as alleged, show a taking of plaintiff’s land or an interest therein.

*254Plaintiff alleges that it is now and has been during the period involved the owner of land in the county of Shasta along the Pitt River in California; that the Pitt River is a tributary of the Sacramento River; that on December 2, 1935, the President of the United States, pursuant to the act of June 25,1910 (36 Stat. 630), approved certain findings of fact by the Secretary of the Interior and his recommendation…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Danforth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. United States v. SponenbargerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Poinsett Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rank v. (Krug) United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1956
  2. Tommy Thompson v. United States of America, and Eight Related CasesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API