Legal Opinion
Gray v. Johnson
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 8, 1968No. 9627PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.
The Secretary of the Interior held that a lease to appellant Gray of Osage Indian land was void because of violations of applicable regulations. Gray brought suit to review the decision of the Secretary. Jurisdiction is granted by 28 U.S.C. § 1361. The district court upheld the Secretary and this appeal followed.
William Fletcher, a full-blood Osage Indian, owns 400 acres of restricted Osage Indian land in Oklahoma. The land was leased to James who had difficulty in complying with lease terms. Ap-pellee Oklahoma Land & Cattle Company, intervenor below and herein…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Boesche v. UdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Bailey v. BanisterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- Fred A. Seaton, Individually and as Secretary of the Interior v. The Texas Company, John Snyder v. The Texas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Bollow v. Federal Reserve Bank of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Jicarilla Apache Tribe v. AndrusCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- Bollow v. Federal Reserve BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Montilla v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Smith v. SorensenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.