Legal Opinion

Sunnyside Cogeneration Associates v. Central Vermont Public Service Corp.

District Court, D. Vermont

Decided January 22, 1996No. 1:92-cv-00091PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

(papers 39, 40, and 51)

MURTHA, Chief Judge.

The plaintiffs in this diversity action claim the defendants breached a contract to provide bridge financing for development of their waste coal cogeneration facility in Utah. As discussed infra, neither plaintiffs nor defendants have met their burden of demonstrating the absence of genuine issues of material fact. Accordingly, the pending cross motions for summary judgment are DENIED.

I. Background

Each party moving for summary judgment has an initial burden of informing the Court of the basis for its motion…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Teachers Insurance & Annuity Ass'n of America v. Tribune Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  5. Arcadian Phosphates, Inc., Judas Azuelos, and Eli Sivan v. Arcadian CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Citibank N.A. v. City of BurlingtonDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2013
  2. Estate of Handy v. R.L. Vallee, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 1998
  3. PREP Tours Inc. v. American Youth Soccer Org.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
  4. PREP Tours Inc. v. American Youth Soccer Org.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API