Legal Opinion

Sid Katz, Inc. v. Walsh & Burney

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1944No. 8149PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sharp

The Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, in the name of Sid Katz, Inc., sued the American District Telegraph Company and Walsh & Burney for negligence in allowing water to escape from a sprinkler system and damage a stock of goods belonging to Sid Katz, Inc. Walsh & Burney, after denying liability, sought to recover over against the American District Telegraph Company, and the American District Telegraph Company sought a recovery over against Walsh & Burney, Joske Bros. Company, and Jud Plumbing & Heating, Inc. In a trial without a jury, plaintiff recovered a judgment against the American…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. National Bond & Mortgage Corp. v. DavisTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  3. Burnett v. OechsnerTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  4. First State Bank v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Co. of New YorkTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Baker Hotel of Dallas, Inc. v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. ScharrenbeckTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Pacific Fire Insurance v. DonaldTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. CrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  4. Jones v. St. JohnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  5. Fitzgerald v. AndradeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API