Conway v. Matthews
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HARWOOD, Judge.
The complaint below contained seven counts.
Count 1 claimed $275 for work and labor done.
Count 2 was in special assumpsit, and claimed $275 due as a broker’s commission under a contract made between the plaintiff *514and defendant, the terms of the contract being set forth in the count.
Counts 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 were respectively common counts claiming $8.80 due for money paid out by plaintiff for defendant at his request; for money received by the defendant to the use of the plaintiff; for money due under an account; under an account stated; and for money paid by plaintiff for the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gulf Trading Co. v. RadcliffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- McCormick v. TissierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Ellison v. Sudduth Realty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Landrum v. BrookshireSupreme Court of Alabama · 1827
3Cited by3 opinions
- Moreno v. May Supply CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
- Pierce v. KelleyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1967
- Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. JonesAlabama Court of Appeals · 1963