Legal Opinion

Jones v. Wohlgemuth

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 7, 1933No. Appeal, 340PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Maggie Jones and Charles Jones sued on behalf of their minor son Marvin and in their own right to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the child while on defendants’ premises. The statement of claim, however, asks no damages for th’e parents in their own right. On the basis of an instrument executed by the parents purporting to release all claims arising from injury to the boy and agreeing to indemnify one of the defendants for any recovery obtained after the minor comes of age, defendant Samuel Wohlgemuth issued a writ of scire facias under the Act of 1929, P. L.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shapiro v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Dively v. Penn-Pittsburgh Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Land Title Bank & Trust Co. v. Cheltenham National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Kravas v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Murray v. Pittsburgh Athletic Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Margiotti v. Union Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API