Legal Opinion
Bungay v. Morin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 16, 1998PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In a visitation proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Amodeo, J.), entered November 18, 1997, as directed him,to pay one-half of the legal fee of the Law Guardian for the children.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
Under the circumstances presented here, the Family Court’s *463apportionment of the Law Guardian’s fee was not improper (see, Petek v Petek, 239 AD2d 327; Cilento v Cilento, 225 AD2d 648; Hughes v Hughes, 224…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Petek v. PetekAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Hughes v. HughesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Cilento v. CilentoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by7 opinions
- Plovnick v. KlingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Lew v. SobelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Pascarelli v. PascarelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Rosenbaum v. RosenbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Campo v. CampoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.