Legal Opinion
Cilento v. Cilento
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 18, 1996PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The determination of the Supreme Court was not improper (see, Hughes v Hughes, 224 AD2d 389). Balletta, J. P., O’Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hughes v. HughesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rupp-Elmasri v. ElmasriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Bungay v. MorinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Pascarelli v. PascarelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Colangelo v. ColangeloNew York Supreme Court · 1998
- Pastarnack v. PastarnackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.