Legal Opinion

Campo v. Campo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 26, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*566In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6 to modify the custody provision of a judgment of divorce, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Pessala, J.), dated October 2, 2002, which, upon granting the motion of the Law Guardian to fix his fees on an hourly basis and to award him an advance retainer, fixed the hourly fee at a rate of $250 per hour, awarded the Law Guardian a $10,000 advance retainer for future services, and directed the father to pay 90% of the Law Guardian’s fee and the mother to pay only 10% of the fee.

Ordered that the order is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Petek v. PetekAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Gadomski v. GadomskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Bungay v. MorinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Madden v. CavanaughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Plovnick v. KlingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API