Legal Opinion
Coakley v. Phelan
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 8, 1935No. 25394PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment and decree denying the foreclosure of a mortgage lien in an action commenced by plaintiff in error James Coakley. .Plaintiff in error M. McGrath files a cross-petition in error from a judgment and decree against him upon a cross-petition in which he claimed title to a portion of the real property involved under a resale tax deed.
On or about November 14, 1910, E. How-land and Eleanor Howland, the then owners of lots 21, 22, 23, and 24, block 29, Capitol Hill, Okla., executed a mortgage on said lots to secure a note in tlie sum of $400, in favor of E. R.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wood v. GoodfellowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Anderson v. BaxterOregon Supreme Court · 1871
- Clinton County v. CoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
- George v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Hanna v. KassonWashington Supreme Court · 1901
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Klondike, Inc. v. BlairDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- Logan v. LoganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Robinson v. EXCHANGE NAT. BANK OF TULSA, OKL.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1939
- Latson Et Ux. v. McCollomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- American Investment Co. v. City Savings BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.