Legal Opinion

Webb v. Lamar

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 14, 1938No. 2 Div. 117PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

Taking the averments of the bill as true and treating amendable defects as amended, as must be done in considering the general demurrer for want of equity, the complainant by the contract of sale and purchase as evidenced by the contract of February 10, 1932, acquired from the Peoples Bank & Trust Company, the vendor, the equitable title to the property, the subject matter of said contract, the vendor retaining the legal title as a security for the payment of the purchase money. Brown v. Beatty, 76 Ala. 250; Bankhead et al. v. Owen, 60 Ala. 457, 466, 467; Seeberg v. Norville et…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bankhead v. OwenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  2. Hammons v. HammonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Seeberg v. NorvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  4. Gillespie v. GibbsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  5. Street v. Alexander City BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ellis v. StickneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  2. Faust v. RagsdaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  3. Graham v. PowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  4. Cook v. CookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  5. Faust v. FaustSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API