Legal Opinion

Faust v. Ragsdale

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 20, 1949No. 4 Div. 519PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAWSON, Justice.

The appellant filed a bill in this cause seeking a review of a decree of the circuit court of Dale County, in equity, rendered July 15, 1946. The bill of review seeks to have the said decree of July 15, 1946, set aside for newly discovered evidence. The appeal is from a decree sustaining the demurrer of appellee.

It affirmatively appears from the bill that the appellant appealed to this court from the decree of July 15, 1946, and that we affirmed the decree of the trial court. Faust v. Faust et al., 248 Ala. 660, 29 So. 2d 133.

As a result of the judgment of affirmance here…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stuart v. StricklandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  2. Louisville & N. R. Co. v. MauterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  3. Werborn v. PinneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  4. Stallworth v. BlumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1873
  5. Webb v. LamarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Barclay v. StanleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  2. Faust v. FaustSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  3. Ryan v. RyanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  4. Carlisle v. McCleskeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  5. Ryan v. RyanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API