In re Stoner
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Industrial Board of Indiana. Certified Questions of Law. Proceeding by Robert Stoner under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, for compensation by the American Zinc Products Company, employer, opposed by the London Guarantee & Accident Company, insurer. Certified questions by the Industrial Board.
1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.
On the facts hereinafter stated, the Industrial Board of Indiana certifies for our decision and determination the questions of law hereinafter stated.
Robert .Stoner was born November 5, 1902; that on and prior to June 4, 1920, he was a resident of the city of Greencastle, in Putnam county, Indiana; that on and prior to June 4, 1920, the American Zinc Products Company was engaged, in the manufacturing business in the city of Greencastle,- Indiana, and was engaged- in the business of manufacturing zinc plates and sheets; that sometime prior to June 4, 1920, Robert Stoner entered the service of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hillestad v. Industrial Insurance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Roszek v. Bauerle & Stark Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1918
- Kruczkowski v. Polonia Publishing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Messmer v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
- Secklich v. Harris-Emery Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Burk v. Montana Power Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1927
- Pierce's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Widdoes v. LaubSuperior Court of Delaware · 1925
- Wood v. SnyderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
- Bartley v. CoutureSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1947
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.