Legal Opinion

People v. Day

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 27, 1945No. Crim. 2338PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLING, J. pro tem.

The appellant Day and one Miramontes were convicted of first degree robbery. The evidence showed that on August 9, 1944, during the noon lunch hour Miramontes entered the office of the Housing Authority in the city of Richmond and at the point of a pistol compelled the two women employees then present to give him the cash on hand in the office. The only evidence connecting appellant with the robbery, other than his confession introduced over the objection that there was no proof of the corpus delicti as to him, is here recited:

Day had up to some time in July, 1944, been…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. HustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. People v. SelbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Hicks v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Hughes v. QuackenbushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. State v. MeyerWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  3. People v. McMonigleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. State v. ShonHawaii Supreme Court · 1963
  5. People v. GarnierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API